The Product

See what a candidate can really do.

Octopus Hire turns every stage of hiring into evidence. From the first CV to the final decision, you see what candidates can actually do, with the reasons behind every read, so you choose on proof, not pedigree or gut.

The Architecture

Everything in one place, not five tools stitched together.

Most hiring runs on a pile of disconnected tools, one for sourcing, one for screening, one for assessment, and none of them share what they learn. Signal gets lost at every handoff, and the candidate and the decision both pay for it. Octopus Hire brings it onto one platform: parsing, simulation, evidence-based scoring, sourcing, and compliance, all working from the same evidence, all backed by a configurable AI Recruiter tuned to each role. You stop stitching tools together and start seeing the whole candidate.

How It Works

From CV to decision.

Every stage produces evidence. Most of it runs in parallel, so the whole pipeline fits in about a week.

CV uploaded
Candidate applies. Octopus starts reading immediately.
VERA reads
Parses the CV, matches it to the role, and gives strong candidates a fair shot at the assessment.
Assessment
A simulation of the real job extracts what the candidate can actually do, with integrity checks alongside.
AI interview optional
An optional voice or text interview that digs deeper, sent in bulk so it scales to every shortlisted candidate.
AURORA projects
Reads the assessment and interview evidence together and builds a forward read of where the candidate can go.
Human interview optional
The recruiter's call. A short, focused conversation, only with the few candidates the evidence already makes them confident about.
Hire
The recruiter decides, backed by everything the evidence has shown, not a gut feeling.
Brain absorbs
Once the outcome is known, it trains the model. Patterns compound over time.

It looks long, but most of it runs in parallel. You send assessments and AI interviews to hundreds of candidates at once, let the projections build over about a week, then step in to interview only the few you are already sure about.

All the screening that drains your time, gone. All your attention, on the decision that matters.

Assessments

A simulation of the real job, not a quiz.

Quizzes tell you almost nothing about whether someone can do the work. So we don't run them. We drop candidates into a simulation of the real job, and you compose it.

Interactive assessment composer.

Step 1 · compose the experience

Pick the formats

Stack as many as you want. The more you add, the richer the read.

Step 2 · what the work reveals

We do not read one thing. We read across everything the role demands.

Dozens of signals from a single assessment, grouped into the dimensions that actually predict success. A few examples in each.

Judgment & problem solving
Problem solvingCritical thinkingDecision-making under pressurePrioritizationAttention to detailNumerical reasoningBusiness judgmentData literacy
People & influence
Sales negotiationHandling rejectionObjection handlingPersuasionConflict resolutionStakeholder managementCustomer empathyCollaboration
Drive & composure
Composure under pressureResilienceAdaptabilityEmotional intelligenceInitiativeOwnershipFollow-throughTime management
Modern fluency
AI fluencyCreativityStrategic thinkingLearning agilityWritten communicationLeadership instinct

And whatever else your role demands. You name what matters, we design a moment into the work that makes the candidate show it, without ever asking directly.

Step 3 · set the difficulty
Moderate

Tuned to the role. Demanding when the job is, lighter when it isn't.

Example: A branching shift scenario where the kind answer quietly fails the next shift. Judgment a quiz never reveals.

What the work can reveal

You tell us what matters. We design the work to show it.

Name the skill or the behaviour you most need to see, and we build a moment into the job that reveals it, without ever asking the candidate directly. A few examples of what that looks like.

The real question

Can they actually use AI, or just say they can?

So we drop a real AI chat inside the task, a blank session that knows nothing, exactly like the one on their desk. To get anything useful out of it, the candidate has to feed it the context, the specifics, the tone, the limits. We read the prompt itself: do they give it what it needs, do they accept a weak draft or push for better, do they stay consistent. Not whether they have heard of AI, but whether they can think with it.

Task: handle this morning's supplier issue
AI chatthe candidate's own session, inside the assessment
Message the AI...

signals extracted

gives the AI real contextsets clear constraintsrejects a weak draftiterates with intent
Live voice negotiation live
AIKarim, procurement leadsimulated client

signals extracted

reframes the objectionstays composeduncovers the real need

The real question

Can they take a hard no?

So we run a live negotiation by voice. A customer pushes back hard and starts to walk, and the candidate has to answer out loud, in real time. You hear whether they fold, get defensive, or find a new angle, before it ever costs you a real deal.

These are just examples. You tell us what matters for the role, and we design the work to reveal it, the skills and the behaviour, without ever asking the candidate directly.

AI interviews, at scale

An AI interview with every shortlisted candidate, not just the lucky few.

Real interviews do not scale. You can sit with five people, not five hundred, so most candidates get judged on a CV they wrote about themselves. The AI interview fixes that. It runs a structured, role-specific video interview with everyone you shortlist, and feeds what they say straight into the same evidence as the assessment.

You configure what it is and what it digs for: a customer it has to win over, a difficult colleague, a client with a problem, or a straight recruiter interview, matched to the role and the exact thing you need to see. Run it across hundreds of candidates in parallel, and by the end of the week you have a real read on all of them.

Then you step in. The short human interview at the end is yours, spent only on the few the evidence already makes you confident about. You can paste your notes from that conversation back in, and they count the same as everything else. Less time spent screening people who were never right. More spent on the decision that matters.

EU AI Act disclosure to candidates and configurable forbidden-topic guardrails are built in.

AI interview Operations Lead · Innovation review
REC 04:12
Candidate

AI interviewer

playing: skeptical executive

"Your team wants to bet a quarter's budget on one change that could cut errors in half, but it means pausing three projects leadership already promised. How do you decide whether to push for it, and what would make you pull the plug in the first month?"

A live, recorded video interview. Signals come from the transcript and feed AURORA. The recording is yours to review.

We read what they said, not how they looked.

Our signals come from the transcript, the substance of what the candidate actually said and how they reasoned. We do not score facial expressions, body language, or tone, the things that bias a decision and that no honest system should claim to read. The full video is yours to review whenever you want, so the human-observable qualities, communication, presence, professionalism, stay a human judgment, made by your recruiter watching the real thing. AI for the evidence at scale. A person for what only a person should judge.

Candidate experience

Rejection that candidates remember for the right reasons.

Every candidate, hired or not, can leave with specific, tailored feedback on where to grow. No two notes are the same, and everyone gets one, not just the finalists.

Sara A. Applied: Sales Associate
CV stage

Your CV shows strong service experience, but the role leans heavily on B2B outreach, which it does not yet evidence. Building even one example of proactive client acquisition would make you a strong fit next time.

Mehdi K. Applied: Shift Supervisor
after assessment

You handled the busy period calmly and communicated clearly. Where you slipped was prioritizing: a few urgent issues waited while smaller ones got attention first. Practicing triage under pressure would lift you fast.

Yasmine B. Applied: Account Manager
after assessment

Your negotiation instincts were excellent, you reframed objections instead of conceding. To reach the next level, work on closing: you opened doors well but did not always ask for the commitment.

Omar T. Applied: Operations Lead
CV stage

Solid operational background. The gap for this role was scale: it manages multi-site coordination, and your experience is single-site so far. Seeking exposure to multi-location work would close that quickly.

Reviewed by a person before sending. Never exposes internal scores.

Compliance

Hiring you can defend.

Bias Audit is built in: four-fifths parity analysis, statistical significance testing, 90-day drift monitoring, and CSV export. GDPR processor model, EU AI Act disclosure, audit logs, and monitoring for US, Canadian, and EU requirements. Always on, always auditable. Because every decision is justified and traceable, compliance teams do not have to take outcomes on faith. During assessment, scoring is architecturally separated from demographic data.

GDPR Processor Model EU AI Act Disclosure Bias Monitoring Audit Logs
Source ROI

Stop spending blind on job boards.

Every candidate is traced back to their source. You get a clear per-channel verdict on which channels are worth your budget, ranked by quality, quantity, and cost efficiency, per role and per location.

Source performance Senior Engineer, Remote
Recommended for this role
92
LinkedIn
71
Indeed
48
Glassdoor
24
Rekrute

See exactly which channel is worth your budget, per role, per location, per hire.

The Brain

Learns who really succeeds in your company, not who looks good on paper.

The Brain studies the hiring outcomes you confirm, who performed and who stayed, and learns what genuinely predicts success in your company specifically: your roles, your context, your reality. That is your Company DNA.

It does not run on day one. It activates once there is enough evidence, and grows sharper with every hire you validate, moving from watching to emerging to established as the picture fills in. To get there faster, you can upload your past hires and their outcomes, so the institutional knowledge you already have starts working for you before your next hire on the platform.

Whenever you open the Brain, it shows what it has learned so far: the patterns that genuinely separate the people who thrive in your company from those who do not. Those patterns mature as evidence grows, from early signals to established ones, and every one of them comes with the reasoning behind it, never a black box.

Watching Emerging Established

See it run on your own roles.

Book a 30-minute demo and watch the full pipeline live, from CV upload through simulations and interviews to a Brain Whisper decision backed by evidence.

Book a Demo